体态、疼痛与康复 MOC

体态/动作 finding、疼痛症状、Safety、Assessment、鉴别假设与运动康复的导航入口;第一阶段 legacy posture/condition/exercise/anatomy 与 source-authority 重构已收口,后续转向真实 EvidenceGap 与 BodySense ingestion。

#life / health #type / moc #status / growing #resource / rehabilitation

[!info] related notes

体态、疼痛与康复 MOC

地图边界

本 MOC 负责导航,不再把所有内容统称为“体态问题”。

Observed Finding / Posture
≠ Symptom
≠ Assessment Result
≠ Mechanism Hypothesis
≠ Condition / Differential Hypothesis
≠ Treatment Target

一条旧笔记如果存在:

posture A
→ muscle B tight / muscle C weak
→ pain D
→ exercise E

当前模型要求逐条验证每一条箭头,而不是整体继承。

推荐阅读顺序

  1. 运动健康知识建模 North Star:Thought Forest 到 BodySense
  2. 体态 Finding 与疼痛关联的解释边界
  3. 体态 Finding 的评估与干预工作流
  4. 安全筛查与升级 MOC
  5. 动作科学 MOC
  6. 生物力学 MOC
  7. 疼痛科学 MOC
  8. 评估与测量 MOC
  9. 训练科学 MOC

统一推理链

Finding / Symptom
→ Safety
→ History + Goal + Context
→ Competing Hypotheses
→ Targeted Assessment
→ Relevance / Differential Update
→ Treatment Eligibility
→ Goal-Specific Intervention + Dose
→ Outcome
→ Reassessment

已完成:Posture / Movement Finding 重构

骨盆

头颈 / 躯干

肩胛 / 关节运动假设

下肢

已完成:Symptom / Differential / Condition 第一批重构

已完成:Exercise / Anatomy 第二轮去“根因化”

训练与解剖页已经明确:

exercise sensation
≠ muscle activation measured

movement finding
≠ single-muscle weakness

general anatomy
≠ current-user muscle state

代表性页面:

已完成:Source Authority 第一轮分层

资源不再只有“好 / 不好”,而是记录适合贡献哪类 knowledge claim

专业二级参考 / Evidence Discovery

  • Physiopedia — professional secondary reference;适合 topic map / terminology / evidence discovery,关键 claim 回到 primary source。
  • Physiotutors — professional clinical education;适合 test execution / evidence discovery,diagnostic accuracy 回原始研究。

Specialty / Public Patient Education

Clinician / Coach Education

  • Squat University — clinician-coach education;适合 lifting cue、screen idea、exercise idea,不用于高风险诊断 policy。

Exercise Library / Demonstration

第一阶段迁移状态:已收口

截至本轮:

life/health + type/debug = 0

这意味着旧 health knowledge 不再默认使用“问题排查页”承载姿态、疼痛与 condition。

语义扫描中仍会出现 tight / weak / inactive / compensation 等词,但绝大多数已经位于:

  • 反例;
  • 禁止推断;
  • differential / symptom description;
  • historical framework explanation。

后续不再以“看到这些词就机械重写”为策略,而只处理仍以肯定语气越级推断的真实问题。

六个底层知识域

Condition 页面统一模板

后续 syndrome / injury 类笔记至少回答:

1. Definition / entity boundary
2. Typical presentation
3. Supporting evidence
4. Conflicting / non-specific evidence
5. Key differentials
6. Safety overlap
7. Examination / diagnostic-test boundary
8. Imaging / electrodiagnostic / referral boundary
9. Conservative Treatment eligibility
10. Progression / reassessment / failure-to-improve pathway
11. BodySense hypothesis contract

Legacy Refactor Checklist

每次重构旧 health note:

  1. 页面角色究竟是 finding、symptom、condition、assessment 还是 synthesis?
  2. 是否把 group association 写成 individual causation?
  3. 是否仅凭外观反推 tight / weak muscle?
  4. 是否把 2D visual observation 越级解释成 kinetics / tissue load?
  5. 是否把 asymmetry 自动解释成 pathology?
  6. 是否缺 Safety / neurological / referral boundary?
  7. Treatment 是否来自 goal / function / capacity,而非“看起来不标准”?
  8. exercise 是否有 dose / progression / regression / reassessment?
  9. BodySense export 是否能保留 finding、provenance、hypothesis、uncertainty 与 action authority?

BodySense / RAG 边界

Thought Forest curated note
→ machine atomic claims
→ source + population + context + certainty + version
→ Targeted RAG
→ current-case admissibility
→ reasoning / policy

General knowledge 不能自动变成 current-user fact。

例如:

“某 posture 在 pain group 平均不同”
≠ “这个 posture 是该用户疼痛原因”

“dynamic valgus 在某 athlete literature 与风险相关”
≠ “这个用户 ACL injury risk = high”

“骨盆一高一低”
≠ “该用户有 anatomical LLD”

“MSI anterior glide pattern”
≠ “已直接测得病理性 joint translation”

“small-finger numbness”
≠ “Guyon / Cubital Tunnel 已定位确诊”

“hip snap sound”
≠ “iliopsoas tightness / intra-articular lesion 已确认”

下一阶段:从知识重构转向 EvidenceGap / Ingestion

第一阶段不再继续为了目录对称平均扩张百科内容。

后续优先级改为:

真实 BodySense case / Eval 暴露 EvidenceGap
→ 定向 research
→ 更新 Thought Forest stable note
→ source / claim / provenance normalization
→ BodySense snapshot / ingestion
→ retrieval + grounding eval

也就是说,下一阶段的核心问题已经从:

“还有哪些运动健康主题没写?”

变成:

“BodySense 当前 reasoning / Treatment / Safety 到底缺哪一类可验证 evidence?”

外部专业资源入口

相关 MOC

创建于 2026/4/28 更新于 2026/8/23